[Pkg-fonts-devel] Packaging Noto fonts

Christian PERRIER bubulle at debian.org
Thu Jun 27 04:23:50 UTC 2013

Quoting Vasudev Kamath (kamathvasudev at gmail.com):

> This should not be a problem as its pedantic warning. Its actually
> done by cdbs (unversioned debhelper depends for purpose of allowing
> easy backporting). Lintian developer reduced the severity to pedantic
> after wheezy release.
> Here Jonas as explained the reasoning [1] better than me :-). So I
> hope you will be okay with this
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705682#62

Ah, so that's indirect noise because of the use of cdbs. If it was
myself, the package wouldn't be using cdbs at all, indeed...:-)

Anyway, is there a reason for debian/compat to not be 9, by the way?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20130627/5aeaf6e8/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list