[Pkg-fonts-devel] Packaging Noto fonts

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Vasudev Kamath (kamathvasudev at gmail.com):

> > Anyway, is there a reason for debian/compat to not be 9, by the way?
> 
> No reasons. If I bump compat to 9 CDBS will generate debhelper
> dependency on >=9 other than that nothing.


My personal stance on this is "use the dh compatibility level that is
supported in stable". The main rationale is that, doing this way,
utilities do behave as "modernly" as possible....without /me to care..:-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20130628/3c4a394b/attachment.sig>