[Pkg-fonts-devel] [RFS] fonts-georgewilliams

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Francesca Ciceri (madamezou at zouish.org):

> As a note: upstream doesn't use versioning of any kind, but as the first
> upstream version was named 1.0 for the Debian packaging, I named this
> one 2.0. Let me know if that's ok.


Not even in either the SFD files or the generated TTF files, i guess?

In such case, I tend to choose to use the upstream release dateif I
can find it....or at worst the date at which you picked up the file
from upstream's web site.

So, something like 20140514-1 for instance.

It's not perfect either but it has (IMHO) the advantage of clearly
saying "hey, upstream doesn't use any versioning system so I decided
to invent one"


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20140514/18172b3b/attachment-0001.sig>