[Pkg-fonts-devel] [RFS] fonts-georgewilliams

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Francesca Ciceri (madamezou at zouish.org):

> What I did was take all the .sfd and put them in a tar.gz. But they were
> released or updated individually, not all together.
> This is why I used the 2.0 notation.
> 
> I guess we can pick the most recent date (which is
> 23 October 2003) or the date I picked the files.
> 
> What does it seems better to you?


I have a small preference for the most recent date (which indeed also
shows that these fonts are fairly old and doesn't give the wrong
feeling this is recent stuff).

Do you mind changing that in git and then I can build/upload?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20140516/130395de/attachment.sig>