[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#762054: d-i.debian.org: investigate ttf-* vs. fonts-* for udebs?

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Cyril Brulebois (kibi at debian.org):
> Hi Fabian,
> 
> Fabian Greffrath <fabian at debian.org> (2015-07-10):
> > Hi Cyril,
> > 
> > Am Freitag, den 10.07.2015, 04:07 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > >     fonts-dejavu and fonts-freefont maintainers, do you concur?
> > >     This would post-alpha 1.
> > 
> > speaking as an Uplaoder for both fonts-freefont and fonts-dejavu, I'd
> > concur that it should be safe and even recommended to switch to the new
> > font packages and use the new package naming scheme.
> 
> Many thanks for the swift reply+confirmation!

I had this mail lying around in my TODO list and nwo I'm mostly ready
to give this a try.

Guys, do you think we want to manage a transition for, say
ttf-freefont-udeb->fonts-freefont-udeb (with transitional package,
etc. as we did for the ttf->fonts transitions)....or will we just
replace the package (given that only the installer is using the udeb)
?

-- 



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20150726/108be366/attachment-0001.sig>