[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

[Dave Crossland]

A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification
triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to binary is a
kind of format change
On Oct 2, 2015 6:02 AM, "Norbert Preining" <preining at logic.at> wrote:

> > What is the relationship between the googlefonts repos and the google
> > fonts repo? It seems a bit weird to have two places for the same stuff.
>
> Looking at the repos, the google fonts repo contains the built, ie
> ready made files, while the googlefonts repo the sources.
>
> Not that this is an explanation - but just for understanding what is where.
>
> > > BTW I believe that Debian must rename all OFL-RFN fonts (just as with
> > > Firefox.)
>
> Why? If the fonts are taken as is it seems to be fine, I don't se
> any need for name change. The RFN clause is about *changed* fonts,
> as far as I remember.
>
> Norbert
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PREINING, Norbert                               http://www.preining.info
> JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
> GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0  ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20151002/50ccd39f/attachment.html>