[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji

Taylor Kline taylor.kline at utexas.edu
Fri Dec 23 05:16:22 UTC 2016

Yikes, that is quite a hassle. I am CC'ing the Debian Fonts Task force and
maybe someone from there has some suggestion on how to deal with the
nototools dependency in order to build the NotoColorEmoji.ttf.

Also I think it's true based on the GitHub repo (
https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji) that only the NotoColorEmoji
source exists. But that is ok, right, I mean who needs black & white?

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Ming-ting “Yao” Wei <medicalwei at gmail.com>

> Hi,
> I am packing that but progressing slowly because there's need to upload
> build dependency (nototools, #848206) to build from source and I might need
> to handle the documentation of the package.
> I can do a rename of this ITP to include the fallback version of the
> emoji. Should we do that? (Also I can't find the source of Noto Emoji
> despite of the redistributable ttf.)
> Yao Wei, sending this on a phone
> On 23 Dec 2016, at 04:17, Taylor Kline <taylor.kline at utexas.edu> wrote:
> Hello Yao,
> Are you progressing with packaging fonts-noto-color-emoji? I filed an RFP:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849042
> and a fonts-noto wishlist item:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849127
> before discovering your intent to package filed on 15 December.
> Thanks,
> -Taylor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20161223/dd744fa8/attachment.html>

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list