[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#855710: Bug#855710: fontforge: Please provide fontforge-doc package with fontforge source package

[Vasudev Kamath]

Hideki Yamane <henrich at debian.or.jp> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:42:25 +0530
> Vasudev Kamath <vasudev-debian at copyninja.info> wrote:
>> >  I'll make a patch for it later.
>
>  Here's a patch for fontforge-doc. Could you review it, please?

I've updated package now with fontforge-doc package. I did it slightly
different way instead of manually copying rely on build system to
install the package.  Please have a look at latest commit on git.

I've not uploaded it yet, if you think its necessary I will upload to
unstable. Let me know. (Or ofcourse you can upload it yourself).

>
>
>  fontforge-extra is another issue, IMO. Because fontforge-doc should
>  provide current fontforge information, so it should be the same version.
>  And -extras seems to be _better_ to be generated with fontforge source
>  package in next step.

Can we now consider generating fontforge-extras from fontforge file?.
Will you request removal of fontforge-extras?. 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20170429/d8780532/attachment.sig>