[Pkg-fonts-devel] Update for fonts-sil-annapurna

Bobby de Vos bobby_devos at sil.org
Wed May 31 14:53:53 UTC 2017

On 2017-05-31 04:20, Fabian Greffrath wrote:

> Well, strictly speaking WOFF fonts are not package documentation so I'd
> reject a package that has these fonts moved there. This is just a
> workaround for a shortcoming in the fontconfig package that we have yet to
> fix (see my previous mail). As I stated before, I'd prefer if we could
> simply not package WOFF fonts until we have sorted out this issue on the
> fontconfig side.

I agree that the WOFFs are not package documentation. They are needed by
the package to make the html/css example files in the documentation
directory display correctly. I was thinking of providing symlinks from
the documentation directory into /usr/share/fonts/woff/packagename/...
once the fontconfig issue is addressed and we can package WOFF.

Thanks, Bobby

Bobby de Vos
/bobby_devos at sil.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20170531/b6c74462/attachment.html>

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list