[Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-roadgeek_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

G├╝rkan Myczko gurkan at phys.ethz.ch
Tue Jan 22 06:50:57 GMT 2019


Hi Thorsten,

> according to some *.props the copyright holder of several fonts is 
> SammDOT.
> Unfortunately there is no license mentioned. Can you please clarify
> with upstream?

Absolutely:

Subject	Re: roadgeeks font
 From	Sammi De Guzman <sammi at sammdot.ca>
To	myczko at phys.ethz.ch
Date	Today 07:26
I created these fonts myself based on the FHWA standard drawings, not 
using
the Roadgeek 2005 fonts at all.

Sammi

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:24 PM Alex Myczko <sengun at phys.ethz.ch> 
wrote:

hi sammi

how did you relicense from the roadgeeks guy who says no commercial
distribution?
https://n1en.org/roadgeek-fonts/

best

--
Gurkan Myczko <myczko at phys.ethz.ch>

-- 
Sammi de Guzman


I hope that's enough?
for reference:
07:20 < tarzeau> is thorsten altheholz here?
07:21 < tarzeau> about the fonts-roadgeek reject: according to some 
*.props the copyright holder is SammDOT which is mentioned in 
debian/copyright and also has the same license with the other guy 
michael adams, according to: 
https://github.com/sammdot/roadgeek-fonts/blob/master/LICENSE
07:21 < tarzeau> not sure how to proceed now...


> Thanks!
>  Thorsten
> 
> 
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.



More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list