[Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-roadgeek_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Gürkan Myczko
gurkan at phys.ethz.ch
Tue Jan 22 06:50:57 GMT 2019
Hi Thorsten,
> according to some *.props the copyright holder of several fonts is
> SammDOT.
> Unfortunately there is no license mentioned. Can you please clarify
> with upstream?
Absolutely:
Subject Re: roadgeeks font
From Sammi De Guzman <sammi at sammdot.ca>
To myczko at phys.ethz.ch
Date Today 07:26
I created these fonts myself based on the FHWA standard drawings, not
using
the Roadgeek 2005 fonts at all.
Sammi
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:24 PM Alex Myczko <sengun at phys.ethz.ch>
wrote:
hi sammi
how did you relicense from the roadgeeks guy who says no commercial
distribution?
https://n1en.org/roadgeek-fonts/
best
--
Gurkan Myczko <myczko at phys.ethz.ch>
--
Sammi de Guzman
I hope that's enough?
for reference:
07:20 < tarzeau> is thorsten altheholz here?
07:21 < tarzeau> about the fonts-roadgeek reject: according to some
*.props the copyright holder is SammDOT which is mentioned in
debian/copyright and also has the same license with the other guy
michael adams, according to:
https://github.com/sammdot/roadgeek-fonts/blob/master/LICENSE
07:21 < tarzeau> not sure how to proceed now...
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel
mailing list