[Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-junicode_1.002-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
gurkan at phys.ethz.ch
Wed Nov 20 06:18:32 GMT 2019
Check my changelog date and your salsa commits. I had the fix done way before you. And yes I prefer 11 over 12.
> On Nov 20, 2019, at 05:34, Hideki Yamane <henrich at iijmio-mail.jp> wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:50:41 +0000
>> Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>> fonts-junicode (1.002-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>> * d/control: drop python2. (Closes: #943072)
>> * d/control: add ttfautohint to Build-Depends.
>> * Bump standards version to 4.4.1.
> As I've posted to list, fixes are committed to salsa, so please merge
> it to your package, and pull it for other packages before next work
> to reduce dups :)
>> * Bump debhelper version to 11.
> Is there any reason to stick to 11 instead of 12?
> I'm curious.
> Hideki Yamane <henrich at iijmio-mail.jp>
More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel