[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#1041312: Bug#1041312: fonts-noto: Migrate to new upstream sources, and split the fonts according to upstream
Jonas Smedegaard
jonas at jones.dk
Wed Dec 31 15:17:48 GMT 2025
This issue currently awaits ftpmaster approval of python-notobuilder.
Quoting Rene Engelhard (2025-11-05 17:07:47)
> Am 23.08.25 03:58, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > [Please reply *only* to 1041312 at bugs.debian.org]
>
> As you wish.. I consider this bad practice, though, since one doesn't
> know whether one actually reads the ml if he's neither in Maintainer nor
> an Uploader...
To clarify: Feel free to Cc individuals, but please avoid cross-posting
(continued, arguably fine to do so initially) to multiple issues.
> > Yes, it is still my plan to restructure the fonts-noto packaging now
> > after the release of Debian 13.
>
> Is there any status on this? There's more and more testsuite checks just
> assuming a current Noto (as shipped as "code copy", which I obviously
> and of course do not do) and our old Noto gets cumbersome in that way,
> too, except containing "too much".
See top-posted bits (done like that to have that paragraph figure as
current summary for this issue, by way of `bts issue ...`).
Sorry for my late reply.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
* Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20251231/92912082/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel
mailing list