[Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-motoya-l-cedar vs. trixie?

[Cyril Brulebois]

Hi,

Paul Gevers <elbrus at debian.org> (2025-05-25):
> On 25-05-2025 02:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Release team, do you prefer enforcing the no new package rule (which
> > has been active for many weeks already), and our sticking to the dirty
> > approach? Or would you be open to having the udeb addition reach trixie
> > so that things are a little cleaner?
> 
> Such an additional binary package sounds like a good candidate for an
> exception.

Thank you very much, I'll keep track of the upload and follow-up
source-only upload, and come back with a formal unblock request
later on.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi at debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20250525/b7659f62/attachment.sig>