Bug#917034: xterm crashes on certain Unicode characters when font was selected with -fa
dickey at his.com
Fri Jan 4 00:15:12 GMT 2019
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 05:42:47PM +0100, Alexander Meyer wrote:
> * Thomas Dickey <dickey at his.com> [2018-12-31 20:32]:
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 06:11:23PM +0100, Alexander Meyer wrote:
> >> * Thomas Dickey <dickey at his.com> [2018-12-31 00:51]:
> >>> Can you make a backtrace for #341, please?
> >> Here it is:
> Thanks a lot for taking the time to investigate the issue and for
> providing the fontconfig patch! I've been away from home and couldn't
> reply earlier.
The trace was helpful - thanks
> As the issue has now been solved xterm-wise, just a few remarks:
> >> Reading symbols from /usr/bin/xterm...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b8/d462fb6f4969a6a228262ceff981af02a1a4d5.debug...done.
> >> done.
> >> (gdb) run -fa 'Noto Mono'
> > fwiw, my Debian/testing machine has these fonts (with "noto" in their names):
> > ii fonts-noto 20181130-1 all metapackage to pull in all Noto fonts
> > ii fonts-noto-cjk 1:20170601+repack1-3 all "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage (CJK regular and bold)
> > ii fonts-noto-color-emoji 0~20180810-1 all color emoji font from Google
> > ii fonts-noto-hinted 20181130-1 all "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage (hinted)
> > ii fonts-noto-mono 20181130-1 all "No Tofu" monospaced font family with large Unicode coverage
> > ii fonts-noto-unhinted 20181130-1 all "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage (unhinted)
> Exactly the same on my system. fonts-noto-color-emoji was only recently
> installed via a dependency at the same time as xterm was upgraded from
> 337 to 338.
> It turns out that simply removing the package fonts-noto-color-emoji
> eliminates the issue! So that's probably the best workaround right now
> for anyone with the same problem, until your patch is incorporated into
That'll be a very popular solution :-)
> > This part is in the newer function which handles fallback fonts.
> > Since your trace shows line-numbers, I'm assuming it's not the Debian package.
> > (Actually the trace seems to show that you've compiled fontconfig -- turning
> > off the optimization might help pinpoint the details).
> For the record, no, the trace had been made with the provided
> xterm-dbgsym and libfontconfig1-dbgsym packages.
I see (I tried using Debian's debug-symbols quite a while back, but didn't
find them useful enough).
Thomas E. Dickey <dickey at invisible-island.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Pkg-freedesktop-maintainers