Bug#864082: [Fontconfig] Next steps for a reproducible Fontconfig?

[Alexander Larsson]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:18 PM Akira TAGOH <akira at tagoh.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:55 PM Alexander Larsson
> <alexander.larsson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree that cache path is wrong as we have something else by that name.
> >
> > host-path kinda hardcodes the sandbox case for rewriting though. Maybe
> > "remapped-path"?
>
> "remap" looks redundant to the element name. simply "to" or "as" as
> you proposed that earlier?

as-path=... ?