Bug#311479: Nexuiz: status update?

[Alexander Schmehl]

Hi!

* Alexander Schmehl <tolimar at debian.org> [060627 22:09]:

> Difficult decission;  Depending on the answer to your next question, I
> still think the best way would be:
> - upload the -hotfix package
>   - with both released hotfixes
>   - with an conflict on the old -data
>   - wait until it's through new
> - upload a complete new -data package
>   - without the first hotfix
>     (Version will be changed; we'll need an eoch for that to work)
>   - depend on -hotfix package

Other idea:
- leave the first hotfix in the data package
- create a the hotfix package with the second hotfix
- upload a new revision of the -data package
  - new -data depends on -hotfix

Pro:
- save mirrors, users and everyone else to redownload -data
- save us to use an epoch for -data

Cons:
- ugly, since the hotfixes are seperated
- ugly, since the -data has a version indicating the first hotfix
  - that could confuse users

Other ideas?  Opinions?


Yours sincerely,
  Alexander

-- 
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20060627/7354b50a/attachment.pgp