Plib, shared libraries issue.

[Ove Kaaven]

Bradley Smith skrev:
> 1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to
> static libraries as upstream intended?

There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really 
have a strong opinion myself (as long as the result works). But if I had 
to choose, I'd probably say static-only, if upstream relations and ease 
of package maintenance matter. It might also result in leaner, meaner, 
and 0.1% (or something) faster games.

> 2. If shared libraries /are/ built, should they all be in one package
> (there are 13 libraries in total), or should they be separated, and
> also what should be done about the sonames of the libraries and the
> name of the package(s)?

In my opinion, one package is fine.