RFS: Briquolo
Matthew Johnson
mjj29 at debian.org
Mon Jan 7 11:39:22 UTC 2008
On Sat Dec 29 14:28, Bradley Smith wrote:
> I'm currently in the process of adopting the briquolo package, and I
> was wondering whether it would make sense to put it into svn, and also
> whether anyone my be interested in sponsoring it for me?
>
> http://debian.brad-smith.co.uk/briquolo/briquolo_0.5.6-3.dsc
Hi, sorry for not replying sooner, I was intending to. If you still need
a sponsor, then I am happy to do so.
A couple of points from reading the packaging:
you should mention yourself in debian/copyright and the licence under
which your packaging is released and you should include the year on
both copyright statements.
you should remove commented debhelper lines which you aren't using.
There are some warnings in the build which you should look at at some
point:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/briquolo/usr/games/briquolo shouldn't
be linked with libfreetype.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/briquolo/usr/games/briquolo shouldn't
be linked with libz.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols)
Other than that it looks in pretty good shape, and I'd be happy to
sponsor it.
In terms of adding it to SVN, you should keep the packaging in some sort
of revision control system, the debian games team SVN is as good as any,
particularly if you would like to include it as a team maintained
package.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20080107/6b0fb40f/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-games-devel
mailing list