Bug#509702: fenix: should list architectures in source stanza

[Guillem Jover]

clone 509702 -1
reassign -1 fenix
found -1 0.92a.dfsg1-5
retitle -1 fenix: Needs a sourceful upload to get correct Architecture in .dsc
retitle 509702 fenix-plugins: Architecture fields out of sync with fenix
thanks

On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 01:57:59 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> reassign 509702 fenix-plugins
> found 509702 0.0.20070803-3
> thanks
> 
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 01:52:23AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Package: fenix
> > Version: 0.92a.dfsg1-5
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > fenix currently lists the architectures for which it should be built in
> > the binary stanza of `debian/control'.  This is wrong.  Instead they
> > should be moved to the source stanza so that builds fail immediately.

Ok, this applies to fenix, and was due to a bug in dpkg-dev fixed long
time ago, a simple sourceful upload will fix this automatically as the
.dsc will get generated anew.

> > Apart from that: is there a reason why not all !64bit architectures
> > are listed?  E.g. powerpc is missing from both fenix and fenix-plugins.
> > There are also other architectures like sparc which have 32bit
> > userspace.  (Not exactly sure about s390, but probably it does not
> > have the weird 31bit one.)
> > 
> > I not-for-us'ed both packages on alpha, ia64 and amd64.
> 
> Oops, obviously it's already too late on this Christmas eve.  It looks
> like only the first of a folded line was copied to fenix-plugins' control
> file.  Thus reassigning and fenix-plugins' line is incomplete.

And this applies to fenix-plugins, and needs to get the Architecture
fields in debian/control synced with the ones from fenix.

regards,
guillem