Patching the Mame source code

Jordi Mallach jordi at debian.org
Thu Jun 16 21:07:18 UTC 2011


On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:49:03PM +0200, Cesare Falco wrote:
> Ok, good to know. Should I remove the typos patches?

I wouldn't. The work's done, it'll surely be applied for the next release,
so why bother removing it?

> I: mess: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 67616kB 73%
> Should we create a mess-common or the like? +1

Gee, 67 mb? +3!

> > I hope I am not being to bikeshedy :)
> Well, a bit... :D

FWIW, I have no problems with typo patches, as long as they always get
forwarded. That said, lintian is not our priest, and making it stop
printing idiocies (some of them are!) isn't our ultimate goal. In the
above case, having just one huge -common package for all architectures is
a good gain. I have other packages with 3MB or so of data and lintian nags
me about creating a -common. Blah!

> No, you aren't. Just be patient, I still have my own way to solve
> things, but I'm working on it... ;)

All our ways should have a place in here!

Jordi

PD: should I release what we have now, or should we wait for 0.143?

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer     http://www.debian.org/
jordi at sindominio.net     jordi at debian.org     http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



More information about the Pkg-games-devel mailing list