Bug#720108: Please upload 0.3.3 to unstable

[Vincent Cheng]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Boris Pek <tehnick-8 at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>  At this point, I see 4 options:
>>>
>>>  1) status quo - leave supertux 0.1.x in sid, and supertux 0.3.x in experimental
>>>  2) only ship development version - upload supertux 0.3.x to unstable
>>>  3) offer both versions, defaulting to development version when user
>>>  runs apt-get install supertux (current option used in Ubuntu) -
>>>  src:supertux-stable offering 0.1.x, src:supertux offering 0.3.x
>>>  4) offer both versions, defaulting to stable version when user runs
>>>  apt-get install supertux - src:supertux offering 0.1.x,
>>>  src:supertux-experimental or src:supertux2 offering 0.3.x
>>
>> Personally, I'd argue for 2, or failing that 3.
>
> +1
>

Ok, so we do have some sort of consensus going now...

I was in favour of 3, but I suppose there's no real reason to be
shipping both 0.1.x and 0.3.x side-by-side other than the fact that
upstream labels 0.1.x as the stable branch, so 2 is fine by me as
well. My experience with supertux 0.3.x has so far been pretty stable,
but anectodal evidence probably isn't worth that much anyways.

However, as long as Christoph objects to it (e.g. [1]), I won't be
deviating from the status quo.

Regards,
Vincent

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2013/08/msg00065.html