Bug#731745: chocolate-doom: Chocolate-Doom 2.0.0 has been released!

[Fabian Greffrath]

Package: chocolate-doom
Version: 1.7.0-3+b1
Severity: wishlist

Hey Jon,

chocolate-doom 2.0.0 has just been released (i.e. git tag'ed [1]) today. Do you
want to package this yourself or would you mind me joining in as a co-
maintainer and preparing that package? Also, now that the chocolate-heretic,
-hexen and -strife branches have been merged, do you think we should ship them
all in the chocolate-doom package (my preference) or should these ports each
get their own packages?

 - Fabian

[1] https://github.com/fragglet/chocolate-
doom/commit/e2f1ba09c6a801242d6641dd08784d721a749589



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages chocolate-doom depends on:
ii  doom-wad-shareware [doom-wad]  1.9.fixed-2
ii  libc6                          2.17-97
ii  libsdl-mixer1.2                1.2.12-9
ii  libsdl-net1.2                  1.2.8-3
ii  libsdl1.2debian                1.2.15-8

chocolate-doom recommends no packages.

chocolate-doom suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information