Bug#699682: Processed: not relevant for wheezy

[Markus Koschany]

On 03.02.2013 22:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 22:29 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> On 03.02.2013 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> No. wheezy-ignore is a tag for the use of the Release Team and should
>>> not be set without their agreement; see the bold sections in
>>> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
>>>
>>> In this case it's also pointless. The BTS knows the bug only affects
>>> unstable so there would be no need for us to ignore it in any case.
>>
>> Sorry for the confusion. I didn't know the BTS knows that the bug only
>> affects unstable. Thanks for the clarification.
> 
> Even if the BTS didn't know that, you shouldn't be setting the
> wheezy-ignore tag without release team authorization; that was my main
> point.
> 
> I'll trust you'll remember this in future. :-)

Now i realize it's better to keep the feet still at a Sunday evening and
not to attempt doing the release team's job. I completely missed the
*bold* text and i'll definitely remember this incident. ;-)

Regards,

Markus

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20130203/982654b6/attachment-0003.pgp>