Bug#677517: minetest 0.4 unstable version

[Matthew Bekkema]

I have made the changes that you recommended so I'll just comment on a
couple of things below.

> - Just wondering, does minetest 0.4.x actually still build with
> libirrlicht-dev 1.7 in unstable? I tested the current version of
> minetest in unstable when I uploaded irrlicht 1.8 to experimental, and
> it ended up with a FTBFS (bug #693277). If minetest 0.4.x requires
> irrlicht 1.8 rather than 1.7.x, please bump the build-depends on
> libirrlicht-dev to (>= 1.8).
Yes, minetest 0.4 builds correctly with both libirrlicht-dev 1.7 and
1.8

> - This is more just an opinion than anything else, but I don't really
> think it's necessary to split the game data into minetest-game-minimal
> and minetest-game-full. In debian/control, -minimal and -full are
> always listed together in the package relationships (there's no
> distinction between the two packages amongst the various relationships
> between all the binary packages), and both packages are already quite
> small in size. I just don't see any advantages to splitting them up
> that offsets the added complexity to the source package.
I had kept them in separate packages because upstream also keeps them
separate but I suppose now that I actually think about it, putting
them both in minetest-data is the more sensible idea.