vlc/vlc-nox distinction

[Sebastian Ramacher]

On 2014-08-17 12:32:55, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Mateusz Łukasik <mati75 at linuxmint.pl> wrote:
> > +1 to drop vlc-nox, albo I think we should making samba plugin as a separate
> > package (#729238) it is pretty unnecessary plugin installation on embedded
> > systems.
> 
> We need to go through NEW anyway, so now would be a great time for
> that. Can you please implement that change in git?

CCing the reverse dependencies of vlc-nox. Maybe they can shed some
light on the vlc / vlc-nox split.

Hi phonon-backend-vlc and cytadela maintainers,

we are currently discussing the removal of vlc-nox. Unfortunatly,
everyone vlc / vlc-nox split predates everyone involved in the current
maintainer team of vlc. Do you you have any insights on that? Is there a
reason your package depends on vlc-nox and not on vlc?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20140817/68f58eee/attachment.sig>