minetest-mod-mobf_2.3.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Martin Quinson]

Hello,

On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:11:45AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 04:00:20AM +0000, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote:
> > 
> > Howdy maintainer,
> > 
> > How did you figure out that this was CC-BY-SA 3.0? I
> > just see CC-BY-SA.
> 
> This is because http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/ points
> to a 404 page pointing to either version of the CC-BY-SA. So I
> understood upstream licence as 'pick the version number you like', as
> in a GPL3+. I'm not sure of what to do here.

You did not answer my previous mail, what is quite understandable with
the end of year break. So I further argument here ;)

Do you mean that I should remove the second paragraph of the following
d/copyright chuck, the one providing the URL?

------------------>8------------
Files: *
Copyright: 2012-2013 sapier (sapier a t gmx net) (main author)
License: CC-BY-SA
 Unless otherwise specified, the content of this package is
 distributed under the Creative Commons Share Alike License (CC-BY-SA).
 .
 You can find a copy of this license at the address
 <http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>
----8<---------------------------

Would you accept the package without that URL? Or what should I do to
solve this issue?
 
 
Bye, Mt.


-- 
Nous avons neuf mois de vie privée avant de naître, ça devrait nous
suffire. -- Heathcote Williams, Actuel n°48, novembre 74.