lgogdownloader v.s. game-data-packager

[Stephen Kitt]

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:21:01 +0200, Alexandre Detiste
<alexandre.detiste at gmail.com> wrote:
> Le vendredi 9 octobre 2015 22:50:02, vous avez écrit :
> > On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 12:08:38 +0200, Alexandre Detiste
> > <alexandre.detiste at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Upcoming lgogdownloader is not backward compatible,
> > > so the new package will need to "Breaks: game-data-packager (xxxxx)"
> > > because G-D-P uses remove --no-extra argument.
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/Sude-/lgogdownloader/commit/3465384e0b1555c9618105648cfc3872b4198fd4
> > 
> > Hasn't lgogdownloader support only been added to game-data-packager since
> > the last release?
> 
> Yes of course, but if GDP is released as-is, it will be broken by 
> the non backward-compatible changes in lgogdownloader argument handling.
[...]
> 
> Adding a lot of run-time version checking is ok for apt & innoextract;
> as the version in Jessie are still usable.
> 
> The easiest solution is to delay GPD release till a new lgogdownloader
> release.
> 
> If that isn't planed anytime soon; maybe would you mind packaging a new git
> snapshot ?

Yup, I can do that!

Regards,

Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20151010/9300b3a8/attachment.sig>