Bug#879071: fixed in 0ad 0.0.22-2

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 18/11/17 16:41, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2017-11-18 17:28 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
>> On 18/11/17 16:21, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>>> 2017-11-18 6:21 GMT+01:00 Petter Reinholdtsen <pere at hungry.com>:
>>>
>>>> [Ludovic Rousseau]
>>>>>  0ad (0.0.22-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>>>>>  .
>>>>>    * Fix "0ad FTBFS with on armhf with gcc 7: error: call of overloaded
>>>>>      'abs(unsigned int)' is ambiguous" by removing support of armhf
>>>>>      (Closes: #879071)
>>>>
>>>> Note, this "fix" did not work, as there are armhf binaries in the
>> archive
>>>> and the new version is not allowed to propagate into testing until the
>>>> armhf binaries are updated to the latest version or removed.  Did you
>>>> file a request for removal?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Adrian Bunk filed bug #880058 "RM: 0ad [armhf] -- NBS; no longer built on
>>> armhf"
>>>
>>> I am not sure it will be enough since the versions for arm64,
>>> kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 must also be removed.
>>> Should I create 3 new bugs for the other 3 architectures?
>>
>> You can just retitle the original bug, with a message explaining the
>> situation (assuming it isn't closed before then).
>>
>> Currently we have:
>>  0ad | 0.0.21-2  | stretch | source, amd64, armhf, i386
>>  0ad | 0.0.21-2  | sid     | source, armhf, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
>>  0ad | 0.0.22-3  | sid     | source, amd64, i386
>>
>> So I think only armhf and kfreebsd-* need removing (not arm64). kfreebsd
>> doesn't affect testing migration in any case.
> 
> So bug #880058, as it is, will remove the armhf version and 0ad should then
> be able to migrate to testing.

Yes.

> I should _not_ file new bugs. Exact?

It probably doesn't matter much, but I think it's easier to retitle
existing bugs if you want to remove the kfreebsd-* binaries as well.

James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20171118/1922e3ac/attachment-0001.sig>