Bug#981731: Multi-threaded bullet

[Dima Kogan]

Markus Koschany <apo at debian.org> writes:

> I have no strong preferences here. I would rebuild all
> reverse-dependencies with the multi-threaded version and see if that
> works. If this is successful, we could just drop single threaded
> support and re-use the existing binary packages (just bumping the
> SONAME and changing the version suffix). What do you think?

Sounds fine by me. Do you already have a set of reverse dependencies in
mind?