Bug#1072065: nethack-console isn't the greatest name

[Tom Goulet]

Package: nethack-console
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

About 23 years ago I suggested a package for Nethack that needed no X11 libs,
and I suggested nethack-console as a name.  Is there a Debian precedent for
this type of package name?  Maybe nethack-tty or nethack-nox are better names?
I've irritated a generation of Nethack users with my poor name.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages nethack-console depends on:
ii  libc6           2.36-9+deb12u7
ii  libncurses6     6.4-4
ii  libtinfo6       6.4-4
pn  nethack-common  <none>

nethack-console recommends no packages.

nethack-console suggests no packages.