Bug#1099044: passage name conflicts with new package from ITP #1098893

[Hoël Bézier]

Am Mo, Okt 06, 2025 am 11:05:39 +0200 schrieb Antoine Le Gonidec:
>Le Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 07:28:15PM +0200, Tobias Frost a écrit :
>> "passage" (the pass replacement) could possibly use "pass" as binary
>> name, as (with only taken a quick look at the package) the seem to be
>> compatible enough so that they are interchangeable -- one could even use
>> the alternatives system to even install both of them.
>
>I really like that suggestion, as there is no reason to have both
>available at the same time on a same system, and that would make a
>transition between one and the other much easier.
>
>Hoël, what do you think of that way to avoid the name collision for the
>binary?

I like the idea of using the alternatives system a lot. I’ll ensure the tools 
are compatible enough and will try to come up with something.
-- 
Hoël Bézier
IUT de Nantes - Service Informatique
3, rue du maréchal Joffre - BP 34103
44041 NANTES CEDEX 1
tél: 02 40 30 60 88