Bug#200452: [cheche@che-che.com: Re: Bug#200452: glabels: Does recover to the same character set]

[Jim Evins]

God I hate i18n problems. ;-)  I am not sure, since I haven't even
looked at 0.4.6 for over a year.  The encodings are right for
iso8859-1.  Is this a problem on screen, in printing or both?

I will need to look into this further.

-Jim

On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 06:19, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Could you please take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/200452 ? There's
> nothing I can do to update gLabels 0.4.6 in the stable branch of Debian
> (Woody) since it is frozen from all but security updates. Is there
> anything you can do about this bug to help Juan (eg. fixes for a future
> 0.4.7?)
> 
> Cheers,
> Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Juan Jose Pablos <cheche@che-che.com> -----
> 
> From: Juan Jose Pablos <cheche@che-che.com>
> To: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@users.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: Bug#200452: glabels: Does recover to the same character set
> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at che-che.com
> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on espresso
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
> 	version=2.60
> 
> Andrew
> 
> I am not sure, maybe this is to do with  the locale?, The contents on 
> the file are right, it just the way it has been recover from disk.
> 
> I am using 1.4 gnome.
> any suggestions on something that I can test?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Andrew Lau wrote:
> >Hi Juan,
> >
> >I've just uploaded the GNOME 2 branch of gLabels v1.92.3 into Debian
> >unstable and I haven't been able to reproduce your bug. It seems like
> >the file format has changed since you filed this bug. Feel free to
> >resubmit a newer bug report if you can reproduce this with 1.99.x
> >
> >Yours sincerely,
> >Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Jim Evins <evins@snaught.com>