Bug#263635: marked as done (Please use gcrypt11/gnutls11 instead
of gcrypt7/gnutls10)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner@bugs.debian.org
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 08:48:19 -0700
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:32:09 -0400
with message-id <E1BskDx-0005xd-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#263635: fixed in file-roller 2.6.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2004 11:38:02 +0000
>From smurf@debian.org Thu Aug 05 04:38:02 2004
Return-path: <smurf@debian.org>
Received: from run.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.41]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BsgVa-0004xD-01; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 04:34:06 -0700
Received: from kiste.smurf.noris.de ([192.109.102.35] ident=smurf)
by server.smurf.noris.de with smtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BsgQa-0004yE-A8
for maintonly@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 13:28:57 +0200
Received: by kiste.smurf.noris.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:28:56 +0200
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:28:56 +0200
From: smurf@debian.org
Subject: Please use gcrypt11/gnutls11 instead of gcrypt7/gnutls10
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <E1BsgQa-0004yE-A8@server.smurf.noris.de>
X-Smurf-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----)
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Subject: Please use gcrypt11/gnutls11 instead of gcrypt7/gnutls10
Package: file-roller
Severity: important
'file-roller' depends on gcrypt7 or gnutls10.
These packages are no longer supported by Upstream and contain serious
deficiencies / bugs which may turn out to be a security problem.
See [0] and followup emails, and [1] for further details.
Therefore, we want to get rid of gcrypt7 and gnutls10 in Sarge.
gcrypt11 and gnutls11 have an upwards-compatible API; in most cases you
only have to update your debian/control file.
Please upload a fixed version soon. Thank you.
NB: I plan to do NMUs (on 2004-08-15) for any packages which haven't
been updated at that time.
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/07/msg00075.html
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/258975
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263635-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2004 15:38:03 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Thu Aug 05 08:38:03 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BskJf-0005VV-00; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 08:38:03 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BskDx-0005xd-00; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:32:09 -0400
From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
To: 263635-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#263635: fixed in file-roller 2.6.2-2
Message-Id: <E1BskDx-0005xd-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:32:09 -0400
Delivered-To: 263635-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Source: file-roller
Source-Version: 2.6.2-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
file-roller, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
file-roller_2.6.2-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/f/file-roller/file-roller_2.6.2-2.diff.gz
file-roller_2.6.2-2.dsc
to pool/main/f/file-roller/file-roller_2.6.2-2.dsc
file-roller_2.6.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/file-roller/file-roller_2.6.2-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 263635@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> (supplier of updated file-roller package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:58:43 +0200
Source: file-roller
Binary: file-roller
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
Changed-By: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Description:
file-roller - an archive manager for GNOME
Closes: 263635
Changes:
file-roller (2.6.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Rebuild against libgnutls11 (closes: #263635).
* Build-depend on libgnomeui 2.6.1.1-4 to enforce the dependency on
libgnutls11.
Files:
7870d220aa78895fc12281378f5edd84 1525 gnome optional file-roller_2.6.2-2.dsc
eab3a7180e6ddf716f040b831de9027f 4858 gnome optional file-roller_2.6.2-2.diff.gz
d0a12ecefa7e8e53bd9b9718f8725fb8 1018470 gnome optional file-roller_2.6.2-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBEk6OrSla4ddfhTMRAtWQAJ9OW1m2FKIK3EL2dTSx/Ol9+c4lsACg2Eb8
uM5FaS85+KfX1+clRYz9xac=
=xArn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----