Bug#282284: marked as done (gnome-vfs2: 2.8.3-3 should have been uploaded to unstable instead of experimental?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:05:34 +0100
with message-id <1100999134.7957.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
and subject line Bug#282284: gnome-vfs2: 2.8.3-3 should have been uploaded to unstable instead of experimental?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2004 00:26:06 +0000
>From q-funk@iki.fi Sat Nov 20 16:26:06 2004
Return-path: <q-funk@iki.fi>
Received: from korppi.suomicommunications.com [217.119.36.25] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CVfYL-0006vI-00; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:26:06 -0800
Received: from route.intranet (gw-1.hel010.suomicommunications.com [217.119.37.203])
	by korppi.suomicommunications.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id iAL0QEL2008763;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:26:14 +0200
Received: from omena.intranet ([172.16.1.14] ident=q-funk)
	by route.intranet with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CVf3J-0005wR-00; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:54:01 +0200
Received: by omena.intranet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:25:21 +0200
From: "Martin-Ăric Racine" <q-funk@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gnome-vfs2: 2.8.3-3 should have been uploaded to unstable instead of
 experimental?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:25:20 +0200
Message-Id: <E1CVf3J-0005wR-00@route.intranet>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnome-vfs2
Severity: normal

2.8.3-3 was uploaded to experimental _after_ 2.8.3-2 was uploaded to unstable. This was probably an unintentional 
mistake when generating the changelog.Debian I suppose?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-imac
Locale: LANG=fi_FI@euro, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI@euro

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282284-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2004 01:06:06 +0000
>From seb128@debian.org Sat Nov 20 17:06:06 2004
Return-path: <seb128@debian.org>
Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CVgB4-0002ch-00; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:06:06 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id EF9352001428;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:05:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 192.168.0.2 (ANancy-151-1-26-109.w83-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.194.78.109])
	by mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9AEDC2001424;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:05:34 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Bug#282284: gnome-vfs2: 2.8.3-3 should have been uploaded to
	unstable instead of experimental?
From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin-=F2ic?= Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>,
	282284-done@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <E1CVf3J-0005wR-00@route.intranet>
References: <E1CVf3J-0005wR-00@route.intranet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:05:34 +0100
Message-Id: <1100999134.7957.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.0 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 282284-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Le dimanche 21 novembre 2004 =E0 02:25 +0200, Martin-?ic Racine a =E9crit=
 :
> Package: gnome-vfs2
> Severity: normal
>=20
> 2.8.3-3 was uploaded to experimental _after_ 2.8.3-2 was uploaded to un=
stable. This was probably an unintentional=20
> mistake when generating the changelog.Debian I suppose?

No, that was on purpose, the patches for pmount are new in Debian, and
not sure they should be pushed in sarge now.