Bug#306238: Re-4: Bug#306238: missing dependency to libgtksourceview1.0-0 (>= 1.2.0)

viktor.abrams@gamma-dv.de, 306238@bugs.debian.org viktor.abrams@gamma-dv.de, 306238@bugs.debian.org
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:19:11 +0000


Hi,

you are right, for people who have made an upgrade to sarge this never =
cares. Only for people like me who only make partial upgrades in regular =
intervals this is a little flaw. The destiny of "version junkies" :).

Regards,

abrams.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Re-2: Bug#306238: missing dependency to libgtksourceview1.0-0 =
(>=3D 1.2.0) (25-Apr-2005 15:31)
From:    lool@dooz.org
To:      viktor.abrams@gamma-dv.de

>         Hi,
>=20
> On lun, avr 25, 2005, viktor.abrams@gamma-dv.de wrote:
> > i've installed debian/sarge in the middle of last year. Later I make =
a
> > partial upgrade to gnome 2.8 maybe also from the experimental tree.
> > There were no dependency upgrades when gedit moves to
> > unstable/testing. So i assume i got libgtksourceview1.0.-1 (1.1.1-1)
> > also from experimental.
>=20
>  If that package ever was in experimental, it now isn't, so there's no
>  point in fixing it.  If I understood you correctly, you don't suffer
>  from any bug right now, do you?
>=20
> > What do you mean with "(Please tag bugs reported against packages in
> > experimental as such.)" ?
> > What tag is necesarry, so that I can write my reports correctly cause
> > I always install gnome if it is avalible in experimental to help with
> > bug reporting.
>=20
>  Please use the "reportbug" tool to report bugs, it provides more
>  information to maintainers such as the versions of packages depended
>  on, and the distribution you track.  It will also offer you the
>  selection of tags.
>=20
>     Regards,
> --=20
> Lo=EFc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
> "Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other."
>=20