Bug#344103: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#344103: GKSU Failure)

Scott Warner tortel1210 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 21 02:32:18 UTC 2005


Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

>This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
>#344103: gksu: failure because of encoding problems,
>which was filed against the gksu package.
>
>It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
>Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov at debian.org>.
>
>Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
>unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
>message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.
>
>Debian bug tracking system administrator
>(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
>Received: (at 344103-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 23:48:57 +0000
>>From kov at debian.org Tue Dec 20 15:48:57 2005
>Return-path: <kov at debian.org>
>Received: from linares.terra.com.br ([200.176.10.195])
>	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
>	id 1EorE1-0006uU-7L
>	for 344103-done at bugs.debian.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:48:57 -0800
>Received: from mubende.terra.com.br (mubende.terra.com.br [200.176.10.8])
>	by linares.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C864DC047
>	for <344103-done at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:48:55 -0200 (BRST)
>X-Terra-Karma: -2%
>X-Terra-Hash: 28c627cba38026f70825af81ab0205f5
>Received-SPF: none (mubende.terra.com.br: 200.176.10.8 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of debian.org) client-ip=200.176.10.8; envelope-from=kov at debian.org; helo=localhost.localdomain;
>Received: from localhost.localdomain (20150182165.user.veloxzone.com.br [201.50.182.165])
>	(authenticated user bhz52091)
>	by mubende.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E75C24807B
>	for <344103-done at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:48:55 -0200 (BRST)
>Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
>	by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
>	(envelope-from <kov at debian.org>)
>	id 1EorDz-0002BZ-Jm
>	for 344103-done at bugs.debian.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:48:55 -0200
>Subject: Re: Bug#344103: GKSU Failure
>From: Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov at debian.org>
>To: 344103-done at bugs.debian.org
>In-Reply-To: <1135115067.17432.23.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>References: <43A76025.5040603 at gmail.com>
>	 <1135071172.4931.37.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>	 <43A8778A.3080809 at gmail.com>
>	 <1135115067.17432.23.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TrEBAa+qCeah+r4FL233"
>Organization: Debian
>Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:48:54 -0200
>Message-Id: <1135122534.7818.1.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
>X-Spam-Level: 
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
>	RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no 
>	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
>
>
>--=-TrEBAa+qCeah+r4FL233
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Em Ter, 2005-12-20 =C3=A0s 19:44 -0200, Guilherme de S. Pastore escreveu:
>  
>
>>I really do not care that much if gksu does not work because the PAM/su
>>configuration is broken. Really, fixing it appropriately on individual
>>broken systems is far easier than working this around in gksu. The
>>decision is not up to me, though.
>>    
>>
>
>I'm with you on this one. Another bug on this same issue was closed some
>months ago, too.
>
>See this:
>
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/10/msg01533.html
>
>Thanks,
>
>--=20
>kov at debian.org: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov>
>Debian:  <http://www.debian.org>  *  <http://www.debian-br.org>
>
>
>--=-TrEBAa+qCeah+r4FL233
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
>Content-Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem
>	assinada digitalmente
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iQIVAwUAQ6iYZRD19pSHPyXxAQJerg/+IiBThzvRPttiWLWSpEwzKISmjDVSUjdK
>j62P1PVff/bxRg/6y3qqicQleVtJvR3iesF4r1RlxMs4zh3q/loVR/q3FbidsXNO
>4LBeguqw515Mr2PfrTwFqG7dC88QdRVdscPuyAWy3vOwT+CfGWhJlYzPaJft4Fsp
>fjv+CV4ujMmtOdePS3HprBQP9nSyirjrgJCp5zHytyfcS1fVCvNQmBW/muS7hV++
>3TPdbd+M3HGZu8xT2S1gzsVoaTbw6QqKohGlFQS/QT26QxbiWeS0u4bKqz6Y7qx2
>38NTzp1EhF/ynk41uFdGVWPxKwLykLZvgEBqhlK8wwM2boqd7Lh/7XaoqUOnbb8d
>O9Jk8WgPRKA1qZLIxiHwV5n8Y9IR1Z61Ja45uAdRUvXD1oyDdo8kckpE227t3vaV
>9dbkGBEzvY/FlSYN7BdKVxvw0CGaQRiRCFtO9KOTkHh2I3jIh+eWBjZ8cikmTHRe
>3pjt6hDDYQ2KGQ1df97hzE3P6IvV8SyS7OvMBF2GEt/dpt42DeeBhu+a67A2NL1K
>+rguUVCVxslvL4tXm8e/6u9EB4ydsUsixMswoH5xNtpmdDStfX/bKaR9/cIaFVdd
>LVBNGnRBNt5Yha2lmHd4MxFl7a3NH9ZE7nUXGdO03mBNPDEjg/TyjKzLItDOvBU+
>1gBlF4TsdDM=
>=EIWH
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>--=-TrEBAa+qCeah+r4FL233--
>
>
>  
>
Wow, I did what that suggested and all is now well. Thank you very much 
for this, I really prefer the GNOME admin things above editing config 
files and command line use.





More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list