Bug#296175: package depends on itself

[Loïc Minier]

        Hi,

On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Unfortunately, I now can't reproduce the problem in a clean woody 
> chroot, which means the problem probably is slightly more complex than =
I 
> initially thought.

 That's a pity, any way fixing the deps in on the todo list.  Let's hope
 it was it.

> (I've seen in a bug report that you temporarily merged with this one 
> that you consider that circular dependencies are alright. Reading the 
> same section of policy, I think the are not.)

 I think circular dependencies are perfectly right, especially for
 packages such as galeon/galeon-common.

   Bye,

-- 
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
"Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other."