Bug#266960: marked as done (gedit: `filename != NULL' failed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:06:04 +0100
with message-id <20050119200604.GA18378@bugs.debian.org>
and subject line gedit: `filename != NULL' failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2004 21:28:39 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Thu Aug 19 14:28:39 2004
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from smtp1.apol.com.tw [203.79.224.62] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BxuSc-0002tw-00; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:28:38 -0700
Received: from jidanni1 (TC218-187-78-80.2-4.dynamic.apol.com.tw [218.187.78.80])
	by smtp1.apol.com.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA2662234
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:28:32 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jidanni by jidanni1 with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bxt0e-0000zl-Me; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:55:40 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gedit: `filename != NULL' failed
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:55:40 +0800
Message-Id: <E1Bxt0e-0000zl-Me@jidanni1>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gedit
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: normal

Seen upon start:
$ gedit
(gedit:3807): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: file gdk-pixbuf-io.c: line 769 (gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file): assertion `filename != NULL' failed

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266960-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2005 20:06:07 +0000
>From lool@bee.dooz.org Wed Jan 19 12:06:06 2005
Return-path: <lool@bee.dooz.org>
Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CrM5e-0003Pu-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:06:06 -0800
Received: from bee.dooz.org (levallois.dooz.org [81.57.180.178])
	by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3835427124B;
	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:06:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 31E906804EDE; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:06:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:06:04 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier <lool@dooz.org>
To: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>, 266960-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: gedit: `filename != NULL' failed
Message-ID: <20050119200604.GA18378@bugs.debian.org>
References: <E1Bxt0e-0000zl-Me@jidanni1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1Bxt0e-0000zl-Me@jidanni1>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 266960-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

        Hi,

 This is a followup for Debian bug <http://bugs.debian.org/266960>.

Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org> - Fri, Aug 20, 2004:

> (gedit:3807): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: file gdk-pixbuf-io.c: line 769 (gd=
k_pixbuf_new_from_file): assertion `filename !=3D NULL' failed

 I think this bug was fixed ages ago, and I'm hence closing it.  Please
 reopen if necessary.

   Thanks,

--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
"Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other."