Bug#269792: marked as done (fails to move inbox across partition boundary)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
Sat, 07 May 2005 17:18:05 -0700


Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:27 +0100
with message-id <200502120003.28172.siward@wanadoo.nl>
and subject line fails to move inbox across partition boundary
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2004 14:21:10 +0000
>From siward@wanadoo.nl Fri Sep 03 07:21:10 2004
Return-path: <siward@wanadoo.nl>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C3EwA-0000AR-00; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 07:21:10 -0700
Received: from smtp08.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.149] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C3Ew9-00022D-00; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:21:09 -0500
Received: from Si (c529da352.cable.wanadoo.nl [82.157.163.82])
	by smtp8.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6775C7BF
	for <bugs@debian.org>; Fri,  3 Sep 2004 16:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from si ([127.0.0.1] ident=root)
	by Si with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C3Ew8-0002vO-00
	for <bugs@debian.org>; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:21:08 +0200
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:21:07 +0200
From: Siward de Groot <siward@wanadoo.nl>
To: "B. Bunny" <bugs@debian.org>
Subject: fails to move inbox across partition boundary
Message-ID: <20040903142107.GC11055@Si.wanadoo.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; Format=Flowed; DelSp=Yes; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.0.17
Lines: 55
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: bugs@debian.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: balsa
Version: 2.0.17-2
Severity: normal

Title : fails to move inbox across partition boundary

I have several linux OS's, each on it's own partition,
  and wanted to have mailboxes on yet another partition
  that is mounted by each of linux's.

Trying to change inbox
  from /var/mail/xuser
  to /my/mail/inbox
  by editing alsa::menu::mailbox::edit::mailboxpath
  failed with errormessage :
    'Rename of /var/mail/inbox to /my/mail/inbox/ failed: \
      invalid cross-debvice link'

When new and old filename are on separate partitions,
  instead of a rename,
  new mailbox must be created,
  contents of old mailbox copied to it,
  and old mailbox deleted
  (this also works when both are on same partition ofcourse).

I "solved" this by editing ~/.gnome2/balsa file (iirc),
  which resulted in 2 [view]s for inbox,
  which did not have same options in ~/. file,
  so i kept both.
Opening inbox and then dragging a message to other view of inbox
  duplicated message first time i did it.
Third time it crashed balsa.
I'm not filing a separate bugreport about this,
  as bts has no package called 'siward', unfortunately :-).
  (a pointer to syntax and meaning of [view] would be nice though).

Alsa also crashed 2 times when i was trying to get it to use new inbox,
  by using menu::preferences, menu::mailbox::edit,
  and menu::mailbox::delete
I was shown a window that gave me option to
  'report this to developers' or restart,
  and as it did not say to simply send coredumpfile named *.core
    that could be found in directory ???
    as an e-mail attachment to you,
  i chose restart.
Perhaps it would be a good idea / a great nuisance
 to change text of popup ?

have fun,

Siward

------------------------------------------------------------

 aargh! a superfluous word !

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 269792-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 00:06:55 +0000
>From netsnipe@optusnet.com.au Sat May 07 17:06:55 2005
Return-path: <netsnipe@optusnet.com.au>
Received: from mail21.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.158] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DUZJv-0005mS-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 17:06:55 -0700
Received: from espresso.caffeine (c211-30-49-101.mirnd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.49.101])
	by mail21.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4806r5Q024894
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <269792-close@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 8 May 2005 10:06:53 +1000
Received: from netsnipe by espresso.caffeine with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DUZNJ-0002JL-Bc
	for 269792-close@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 10:10:25 +1000
Resent-From: netsnipe@optusnet.com.au
Resent-Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 10:10:25 +1000
Resent-Message-ID: <20050508001025.GA8871@localhost.localdomain>
Resent-To: 269792-close@bugs.debian.org
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=fetchmail)
	by espresso.caffeine with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1Czoc1-0001o6-V3
	for netsnipe@localhost; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:10:30 +1100
Received: from mail.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.243]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.5)
	for netsnipe@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:10:29 +1100 (EST)
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.206])
	by mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1BN3msB000566
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <netsnipe@optusnet.com.au>; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:03:49 +1100
Received: from smtp06.wanadoo.nl ([194.134.35.146])
	by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1CzjpC-0004Z4-F3
	for netsnipe@users.sourceforge.net; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:03:47 -0800
Received: from c529da352.cable.wanadoo.nl (c529da352.cable.wanadoo.nl [82.157.163.82])
	by smtp6.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ABF3A251F5; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Siward de Groot <siward@wanadoo.nl>
Organization: org
To: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: fails to move inbox across partition boundary
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:27 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <20040903142107.GC11055@Si.wanadoo.nl> <20050202130503.GA28230@espresso>
In-Reply-To: <20050202130503.GA28230@espresso>
Cc: Bugs Bunny <bugs@the.carrotfield.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502120003.28172.siward@wanadoo.nl>
Resent-Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 10:10:25 +1000
Delivered-To: 269792-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:05, you wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 04:21:07PM +0200, Siward de Groot wrote:
| > Package: balsa
| > Version: 2.0.17-2
| > Severity: normal
| >
| > Title : fails to move inbox across partition boundary
| >
| So what would you like me to do about this bug report? Does it still
| affect Balsa 2.2.x?
|
I don't know whether it affects 2.2.x ,
  and i don't have time to experiment with my mail system now.
Also i am probably the only one who wants cross-partition mailboxes,
  so please feel free to close this bug.

have fun !

  Siward