Bug#308825: This bug isn't RC, in my humble opinion

[Steve Langasek]

--9Q2l3mYpK16UQ/iv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:46:38PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
>   For what it's worth, I think the severity of this bug is exaggerated.
>  GDM is certainly not "unusable or mostly so" for any of the systems
>  I've touched lately - indeed, this bug doesn't affect them at all.

>   In fact, this bug seems to be a perfect match for the "important"
>  severity:  =ABa bug which has a major effect on the usability of a
>  package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.=BB

>   But then again, I'm no release manager..

FWIW, although this bug has been downgraded because it's unlikely to be an
RC bug in GDM, it's also very possible that this report represents an RC bug
in some other package involved.

AFAIK, no one has yet tried to reproduce the submitter's configuration to
verify whether libnss_ldap/libpam_ldap currently work for GDM.

--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--9Q2l3mYpK16UQ/iv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCk6zlKN6ufymYLloRAkoWAJ9ihsQKiR0XPeJ59L+cdEB5GbubgQCgpQI7
wmOwDhkItJZJHV1nL4ayquk=
=ilE5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9Q2l3mYpK16UQ/iv--