Bug#334450: Review of proposed stable changes

[Martin Schulze]

Loic Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Indeed, they're missing.  Your source package is in the archive, though,
> > and looks good.
> 
>  There's something wrong, still no buildd logs appear for libgnomeprint.
> 
>  Would you please have a look at wanna-build?

Hmm, that's strange.

wanna-build says:

alpha: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
arm: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
hppa: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
i386: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
ia64: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
m68k: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
mips: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
mipsel: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
powerpc: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
s390: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]
sparc: libs/libgnomeprint_2.8.2-1: Installed [optional:]

So it doesn't even know about the new version 2.8.2-1.1.

I'll ping neuro.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Have you ever noticed that "General Public Licence" contains the word "Pub"?

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.