Bug#339685: glib2.0: Not binNMU-able using + notation.

[Sebastien Bacher]

On ven, 2005-11-18 at 00:54 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:

> allow the old scheme anymore.  For some reason we ended up with
> libglib2.0-0 depending on libglib2.0-udeb

Please debug this so we can know that next upload will not do the same.


> Maybe I can get the archive to accept the -1.0.1 again, but I'm
> not sure (yete).  Would you have a problem if I did an NMU for this?

No need of a NMU, I'm responsive. Start by figuring why you Depends on a
udeb.


Cheers,

Sebastien Bacher