Bug#340416: marked as done (gtk+2.0: builds against freetype2,
but doesn't build-depend on it)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner at bugs.debian.org
Wed Nov 23 16:03:22 UTC 2005
Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:55:46 +0100
with message-id <20051123155546.GA1669 at bugs.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#340416: gtk+2.0: builds against freetype2, but doesn't build-depend on it
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2005 11:43:06 +0000
>From vorlon at debian.org Wed Nov 23 03:43:06 2005
Return-path: <vorlon at debian.org>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eet1m-0007TQ-Ez
for submit at bugs.debian.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:43:06 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3011B7005; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:43:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:43:06 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: gtk+2.0: builds against freetype2, but doesn't build-depend on it
Message-ID: <20051123114306.GA7378 at tennyson.dodds.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: gtk+2.0
Version: 2.6.10-2
Severity: minor
The gtk+2.0 source package uses libfreetype6-dev when building, but lacks a
build-dependency on it. Instead, it relies on the fact that libpango1.0-dev
depends on freetype in order for it to be detected. Since gtk+2.0 uses
freetype directly, and not just through pango, this should be a
build-dependency of gtk+2.0; please add it to the control file where it
belongs.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon at debian.org http://www.debian.org/
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDhFXKKN6ufymYLloRAlKlAJwPD6UnS9DQ6Z5COwRLbhKvs5Fk4gCeJdgK
gPjHoJXZoG1ktRvsCp1HZOc=
=KyZF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 340416-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2005 15:55:54 +0000
>From lool at dooz.org Wed Nov 23 07:55:54 2005
Return-path: <lool at dooz.org>
Received: from 217-19-192-73.dti.cegetel.net ([217.19.192.73] helo=smtp.cegetel.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EewyP-0006Iz-Vr
for 340416-done at bugs.debian.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:55:54 -0800
Received: from mx0.bpl-group.org (mx0.bpl-group.org [195.115.71.69])
by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7BC6A013B;
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:55:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bee.dooz.org (lan-26.int.bpl-group.org [192.168.16.26])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "lminier.people.bpl-group.org", Issuer "BPL Group People Certification Authority" (verified OK))
by mx0.bpl-group.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA05C528;
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CE9FC4F0082; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:55:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:55:46 +0100
From: Loic Minier <lool at dooz.org>
To: Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org>, 340416-done at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#340416: gtk+2.0: builds against freetype2, but doesn't build-depend on it
Message-ID: <20051123155546.GA1669 at bugs.debian.org>
References: <20051123114306.GA7378 at tennyson.dodds.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051123114306.GA7378 at tennyson.dodds.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 2.8.0-1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The gtk+2.0 source package uses libfreetype6-dev when building, but lac=
ks a
> build-dependency on it. Instead, it relies on the fact that libpango1.=
0-dev
> depends on freetype in order for it to be detected. Since gtk+2.0 uses
> freetype directly, and not just through pango, this should be a
> build-dependency of gtk+2.0; please add it to the control file where it
> belongs.
I found references to freetype in 2.6 Gtk's source, but not in the 2.8
series (except in gdk/linux-fb which isn't built for Debian AFAICT),
hence I'm closing the bug with the first upstream version we uploaded
to experimental without the freetype requirement.
(It would be nice if you could double-check though.)
BTW, the GNOME team is ready since a good while to try moving gtk 2.8
to unstable, but postponed due to cairo being stuck behind freetype. I
really hope we can get gtk in the pipe ASAP, and if you think there's a
way to do so without waiting for the end of the multi-months freetype +
libstdc++ new transitions, that's be nice. :)
Bye,
--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <lool at dooz.org>
More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list