Bug#334450: Review of proposed stable changes

[Martin Schulze]

Loic Minier wrote:
>         Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > If I understand the problem correctly, for some reason libgnomeprint does
> > not use the proper lpr command.  However, the patch does not implicate
> > the execution location.
> 
>  Actually, the problem is not the PATH or the availability of the lpr
>  command, but simply a mistake in the arguments passed to popen(3).
>  Linux' popen doesn't support the "b" flag which means "binary" under
>  windows (windows doesn't assume binary by default).
> 
>  I'm sorry for having wasted your time with the first patch, attached is
>  a clean patch which fixes only the flags passed to popen().  It is a
>  one-liner.

Understood.  I misparsed the patch.

Please upload a fixed package based on the patch you attached.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
MIME - broken solution for a broken design.  -- Ralf Baechle

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.