Bug#334450: Review of proposed stable changes

[Martin Schulze]

Loic Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > That looks a lot better.  There's one more thing, though, you'll have to
> > do before you can upload: bump up the version number since you had already
> > uploaded the other package with the large diff.  After that, it should be
> > fine. (the urgency should be at least medium, though, but that's not that
> > important).
> 
>  When I uploaded it, that was with a .2 NMU number (ie. I bumped the
>  version).  The urgency was low though, but you said that's not as
>  important.
> 
>  I don't see buildd logs for this version though.

Indeed, they're missing.  Your source package is in the archive, though,
and looks good.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Still can't talk about what I can't talk about.  Sorry.  -- Bruce Schneier

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.