Bug#306956: marked as done (missing versioned package dependency)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Tue Sep 6 09:48:23 UTC 2005


Your message dated Tue, 6 Sep 2005 02:43:21 -0700
with message-id <20050906094321.GL17585 at cyberhqz.com>
and subject line Bug#306956: missing versioned package dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2005 16:15:01 +0000
>From tux-master at web.de Fri Apr 29 09:15:00 2005
Return-path: <tux-master at web.de>
Received: from smtp08.web.de [217.72.192.226] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DRY8q-0000Mx-00; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:15:00 -0700
Received: from [84.180.134.54] (helo=localhost)
	by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(WEB.DE 4.105 #282)
	id 1DRY8L-00030w-00; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:14:29 +0200
Received: from jens by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRY8M-0000xq-1E; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:14:30 +0200
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:14:29 +0200
From: Jens Seidel <jensseidel at users.sf.net>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: missing versioned package dependency
Message-ID: <20050429161429.GA3689 at pluto>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: tux-master at web.de
X-Sender: tux-master at web.de
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gdm
Version: 2.6.0.8-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 4.2

Hi,

I tried to build gdm and failed most probably because I forgot to call
 # apt-get build-dep gdm
(or called this for gpm??). I checked missing build-depends manually on
my host and suggest to improve build-depends a little bit.

$ apt-cache showsrc gdm
Package: gdm
Binary: gdm
Version: 2.6.0.8-1
Priority: optional
Section: gnome
Maintainer: Ryan Murray <rmurray at debian.org>
Build-Depends: libpam0g-dev, libgnomeui-dev (>= 1.96.0), librsvg2-dev, libglade2-dev, libwrap0-dev, debhelper, gettext, intltool, scrollkeeper, libselinux1-dev, libattr1-dev, xlibs-static-dev, libxt-dev

The first official libgnomeui-dev package was 1.106.0-1 so it may be
possible to remove >= 1.96.0 nevertheless I strongly suggest to add >=
1.1.1 to librsvg2-dev since configure (line 2391) requires it.

Since it is very unlikely that someone uses such an old version I filled
only a wishlist and not a serious bug report.

Jens

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306956-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 09:43:22 +0000
>From rmurray at cyberhqz.com Tue Sep 06 02:43:22 2005
Return-path: <rmurray at cyberhqz.com>
Received: from h24-80-164-222.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.80.164.222] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ECZz8-0001s8-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 02:43:22 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052B31902A;
	Tue,  6 Sep 2005 02:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 20626-09; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 02:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 340F519027; Tue,  6 Sep 2005 02:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 02:43:21 -0700
From: Ryan Murray <rmurray at debian.org>
To: Jens Seidel <jensseidel at users.sf.net>,
	306956-done at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#306956: missing versioned package dependency
Message-ID: <20050906094321.GL17585 at cyberhqz.com>
References: <20050429161429.GA3689 at pluto>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050429161429.GA3689 at pluto>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 306956-done at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 06:14:29PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Build-Depends: libpam0g-dev, libgnomeui-dev (>= 1.96.0), librsvg2-dev, libglade2-dev, libwrap0-dev, debhelper, gettext, intltool, scrollkeeper, libselinux1-dev, libattr1-dev, xlibs-static-dev, libxt-dev
> 
> The first official libgnomeui-dev package was 1.106.0-1 so it may be
> possible to remove >= 1.96.0 nevertheless I strongly suggest to add >=
> 1.1.1 to librsvg2-dev since configure (line 2391) requires it.

librsvg2-dev has version 1.1.6-3 in oldstable (woody).  I remove cruft from
my build-depends for releases prior to oldstable, so I don't see much point
in adding this.





More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list