Bug#329340: gconf2: Local configuration sources do not work anymore
Free Ekanayaka
free at 64studio.com
Thu Sep 22 08:47:35 UTC 2005
|--==> Josselin Mouette writes:
JM> Le jeudi 22 septembre 2005 à 08:35 +0100, Free Ekanayaka a écrit :
>>Then, to populate the configuration source with the relevant
>>%gconf.xml, I run:
>>
>>gconftool-2 --direct \
>>--config-source xml:readwrite:/usr/share/gconf/cdd.defaults \
>>--load my.entries
JM> I don't know who had the idea to populate a directory in /usr this way,
JM> but he got it all wrong. I completely misunderstood the way you were
JM> populating gconf entries, and it is *very* wrong. You shouldn't do that
JM> in /usr.
Well, the idea came from the Gnome Administration Guide:
http://www.gnome.org/learn/admin-guide/latest/ch01s05.html
and
http://www.gnome.org/learn/admin-guide/latest/ch01s06.html
Let me also add that I'm not populating /usr *directly*, what I
actually do is to issue the command in the debian/rules file of debian
package, which in turns installs the %gconf files under /usr. See:
http://demudi.agnula.org/file/packages/cdd/debian/rules
JM> We're currently discussing it on IRC. We'll have to come up with a
JM> correct framework for CDD distributions, as it seems everyone got it all
JM> wrong.
That's good.
JM> In the end, we'll try to keep it simple, but one things is sure:
JM> you'll have to change the way you are doing things. Just don't use what
JM> was done in gconf2 2.10.1-2, it's simply not suitable for this kind of
JM> needs.
Ok, I've no problem in changing, please just let me know when you end
up to a satisfactory solution.
Cheers,
Free
More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list