Bug#329340: gconf2: Local configuration sources do not work anymore

Free Ekanayaka free at 64studio.com
Thu Sep 22 08:47:35 UTC 2005


|--==> Josselin Mouette writes:

  JM> Le jeudi 22 septembre 2005 à 08:35 +0100, Free Ekanayaka a écrit :
  >>Then,   to  populate  the  configuration   source  with  the  relevant
  >>%gconf.xml, I run:
  >>
  >>gconftool-2 --direct \
  >>--config-source xml:readwrite:/usr/share/gconf/cdd.defaults \
  >>--load my.entries

  JM> I don't know who had the idea to populate a directory in /usr this way,
  JM> but he got it all wrong. I completely misunderstood the way you were
  JM> populating gconf entries, and it is *very* wrong. You shouldn't do that
  JM> in /usr.

Well, the idea came from the Gnome Administration Guide:

http://www.gnome.org/learn/admin-guide/latest/ch01s05.html

and

http://www.gnome.org/learn/admin-guide/latest/ch01s06.html

Let me   also add  that I'm   not populating  /usr *directly*,  what I
actually do is to issue the command in the debian/rules file of debian
package, which in turns installs the %gconf files under /usr. See:

http://demudi.agnula.org/file/packages/cdd/debian/rules

  JM> We're currently discussing it on IRC. We'll have to come up with a
  JM> correct framework for CDD distributions, as it seems everyone got it all
  JM> wrong.

That's good.

  JM> In the end, we'll try to keep it simple, but one things is sure:
  JM> you'll have to change the way you are doing things. Just don't use what
  JM> was done in gconf2 2.10.1-2, it's simply not suitable for this kind of
  JM> needs.

Ok, I've no problem in changing, please just let  me know when you end
up to a satisfactory solution.

Cheers,

Free







More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list