Bug#401477: Missing build-dependency

Josselin Mouette joss at debian.org
Mon Dec 4 20:58:07 CET 2006


Le lundi 04 décembre 2006 à 14:31 +0100, David Weinehall a écrit :
> > Please don't built GNOME packages in experimental against experimental
> > X11 libraries! This is going to tangle GNOME 2.16 with these
> > experimental X11 libraries. You should use as much as possible from
> > unstable when building experimental packages.
> 
> I'm not building them for purposes of uploading them, just for testing
> purposes, to find problems before the packages reaches unstable.

That is indeed what I was afraid of :)

Thinking of it, the problem may be caused by a missing build-dependency
on libx11-dev. It is so easily brought in by other packages that it can
be omitted. Does the XCB implementation not make other X libraries
depend on libx11 ?
-- 
Josselin Mouette                /\./\

"Do you have any more insane proposals for me?"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20061204/704f895b/attachment-0001.pgp


More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list