Bug#324681: marked as done (libgtk2.0-0-dbg: strange directory
and missing symlinks)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner at bugs.debian.org
Thu Jan 26 17:18:12 UTC 2006
Your message dated Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:10:39 +0100
with message-id <1138295439.11015.106.camel at localhost.localdomain>
and subject line [Fwd: Re: Debugging evolution]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 13:20:22 +0000
>From bonnaud at lis.inpg.fr Tue Aug 23 06:20:22 2005
Return-path: <bonnaud at lis.inpg.fr>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7YhS-0005Fo-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:20:22 -0700
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C12E3067CF;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369272C80E3;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 26376-03; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id CD70A2C80E1;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:39 +0200
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <bonnaud at lis.inpg.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libgtk2.0-0-dbg: strange directory and missing symlinks
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:39 +0200
Message-Id: <20050823131939.CD70A2C80E1 at smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libgtk2.0-0-dbg
Version: 2.8.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
I'm trying to use libgtk2.0-0-dbg to debug galeon. Unfortunately I have some
problems:
- libgtk2.0-0-dbg installs files in /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/ whereas many other
lib*-dbg libraries install files in /usr/lib/. I can work around this by
setting:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug:/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib
but I wonder if there is a particular reason for this ?
- libgtk2.0-0-dbg installs /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.800.0
but no libgtk-x11-2.0.so symlink. Therefore my LD_LIBRARY_PATH trick does
not work (ld.so still uses the non debug GTK library). Compare with what
the libpango1.0-dbg package does:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2005-08-19 06:14 /usr/lib/debug/libpango-1.0.so -> libpango-1.0.so.0.1000.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2005-08-19 06:14 /usr/lib/debug/libpango-1.0.so.0 -> libpango-1.0.so.0.1000.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 581795 2005-08-17 18:03 /usr/lib/debug/libpango-1.0.so.0.1000.0
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR at euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR at euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages libgtk2.0-0-dbg depends on:
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.0-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
libgtk2.0-0-dbg recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324681-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2006 17:10:43 +0000
>From ondrej at sury.org Thu Jan 26 09:10:43 2006
Return-path: <ondrej at sury.org>
Received: from ubuntu.cz ([81.95.102.29] helo=mail.ubuntu.cz)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F2Adv-0000jV-8C
for 324681-done at bugs.debian.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:10:43 -0800
Received: from [172.20.20.162] (fw.nic.cz [217.31.192.140])
by mail.ubuntu.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104DCA038378
for <324681-done at bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:10:41 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Debugging evolution]
From: Ondrej Sury <ondrej at sury.org>
To: 324681-done at bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MaEBV0Be/GO+1UgZ8qLl"
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:10:39 +0100
Message-Id: <1138295439.11015.106.camel at localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-MaEBV0Be/GO+1UgZ8qLl
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-Ig2LGk6HagjO2pY4g0oQ"
--=-Ig2LGk6HagjO2pY4g0oQ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> libgtk2.0-0-dbg doesn't ship real libraries but only the debugging
> symbols that correspond to the libraries in libgtk2.0-0. gdb (and
other
> debugging tools) should automatically pick up the debugging symbols
from
> the files in /usr/lib/debug.
--=20
Ondrej Sury <ondrej at sury.org>
--=-Ig2LGk6HagjO2pY4g0oQ
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: Debugging evolution
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <bounce-debian-gtk-gnome=ondrej=sury.org at lists.debian.org>
Received: from mail.ubuntu.cz ([unix socket]) by ubuntu (Cyrus
v2.2.12-Debian-2.2.12-0.5ubuntu0) with LMTPA; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:47:20
+0100
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ubuntu.cz
(Postfix) with SMTP id 5629AA038338 for <ondrej at sury.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006
17:47:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [146.82.138.6]) by
mail.ubuntu.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D32A038378 for <ondrej at sury.org>;
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:47:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murphy.debian.org
(Postfix) with QMQP id 8CF4C2E9A2; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:47:13 -0600 (CST)
Old-Return-Path: <mini at nada.kth.se>
X-Original-To: debian-gtk-gnome at lists.debian.org
Received: from smtp.nada.kth.se (essemtepe.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.115])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D8E2DF37 for
<debian-gtk-gnome at lists.debian.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:03:27 -0600 (CST)
X-Authentication-Info: The sender was authenticated as mini using PLAIN at
smtp.nada.kth.se
Received: from yossarian.lan (84-217-18-200.tn.glocalnet.net
[84.217.18.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.nada.kth.se
(8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0QG3OdO029756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:03:24 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: Debugging evolution
From: Mikael Nilsson <mini at nada.kth.se>
To: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= <daenzer at debian.org>
Cc: debian-gtk-gnome at lists.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <1138273237.17141.153.camel at localhost>
References: <1138271303.15681.6.camel at yossarian>
<1138273237.17141.153.camel at localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:03:18 +0100
Message-Id: <1138291398.10092.2.camel at yossarian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-09-11_01
X-Rc-Virus: 2005-11-10_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-09-11_01
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
autolearn=no version=3.0.3
Resent-Message-ID: <0c0dbC.A.jb.R0P2DB at murphy>
Resent-From: debian-gtk-gnome at lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-gtk-gnome at lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13481
X-Loop: debian-gtk-gnome at lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-gtk-gnome.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-gtk-gnome at lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-gtk-gnome-request at lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-gtk-gnome-request at lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-gtk-gnome-request at lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-gtk-gnome-request at lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:47:13 -0600 (CST)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Jan 26 17:47:20 2006
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 9809 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 43d8fd18150391281911701
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, could, 0.01000, but, 0.01000,
List-Unsubscribe*mailto+debian-gtk-gnome-request, 0.01000,
Received*Postfix+with, 0.01000, Received*Postfix+with, 0.01000,
Received*localhost, 0.01000, Received*localhost, 0.01000, in+usr, 0.01000,
Received*by+murphy.debian.org, 0.01000, Received*by+murphy.debian.org,
0.01000, Received*debian-gtk-gnome+lists.debian.org, 0.01000,
X-Mailing-List*debian-gtk-gnome, 0.01000, org, 0.01000, org, 0.01000, from,
0.01000, Content-Type*text+plain, 0.01000, of, 0.01000, Received*ESMTP,
0.01000, Received*ESMTP, 0.01000, List-Post*debian-gtk-gnome, 0.01000,
Received*bits, 0.01000, Received*bits, 0.01000,
X-Spam-Status*AWL+FORGED_RCVD_HELO, 0.01000, gtk, 0.01000, Resent-Date*Thu,
0.01000, Content-Transfer-Encoding*8bit, 0.01000,
List-Unsubscribe*unsubscribe, 0.01000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
tor 2006-01-26 klockan 12:00 +0100 skrev Michel D=E4nzer:
>=20
> libgtk2.0-0-dbg doesn't ship real libraries but only the debugging
> symbols that correspond to the libraries in libgtk2.0-0. gdb (and other
> debugging tools) should automatically pick up the debugging symbols from
> the files in /usr/lib/debug.
Ok, thanks a lot.... that explains everything.
>=20
> In other words, the bug above is invalid.
Yes. Maybe someone could add the above comment and close it?=20
/Mikael
--=20
Plus =E7a change, plus c'est la m=EAme chose
--=20
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST at lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster at lists.debian.o=
rg
--=-Ig2LGk6HagjO2pY4g0oQ--
--=-MaEBV0Be/GO+1UgZ8qLl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBD2QKP9OZqfMIN8nMRAh7EAJsFQX/IAtP894fsEB9KqsJoEnyAwACfc0My
fPm1Gitau7VCn9P8oUJtZPo=
=zvr+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-MaEBV0Be/GO+1UgZ8qLl--
More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list