Bug#368916: Patch in debian package?

[Josselin Mouette]

On sam, 2007-12-22 at 18:23 +0100, Patrik Fimml wrote:
> Seeing not much progress on this issue upstream, a patch on the Debian
> side would be useful, I think. The variable actually should be
> TERM=gnome-256color, which is included in the "ncurses-term" package. A
> dependency on this package should be introduced together with the patch
> (kterm depends on it as well, so that shouldn't be much of a problem).

This is feasible, but we’d need to test it on a wide scale, because it
could break a lot of things.

Daniel, do you know how the gnome-* terminfo entries were written? Are
they actually based on the vte capabilities? If they do, why not
shipping them directly in the vte packages?

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20071225/040ec73b/attachment.pgp